Overview
Third party hair transplant has been theorized WHEN paired with bone marrow replacement.
Somehow the "firmware update" of the marrow fosters autoimmunce acceptance of the follicle, a minor organ.
Sell-side con: hair is still an organ. Rich are still exploiting the bodies of the poor. Sell-side pro: some broke guy out there could get transformative, generational wealth off a guy like Ballmer or Bezos.
Buy-side con: bone marrow replacement too strenuous and risky for cosmetic applications. Buy-side pro: you're really wagging your finger at a guy like Bezos, as if he lacks agency? Also, are we talking cosmetic, or restorative?
Ballmer and Bezos have more billions than years left. A man in Bangladesh has plush, Elvis-like hair. Shouldn't they trade? Why or why not?
Discussion
We're planning a series of interviews, podcast episodes,
X spaces, informal chats and other fora on this topic. Stay tuned for more information.
Book
After discussions are held, critically showcasing opposing and adverse viewpoints,
then we can consider bookwriting. On the strength of the above discourse, if we write, we hope to do the topic justice.
Feedback
Have interest in this topic? Please reach out to inquiries@paine.press.
We'd love to hear from you.
In general, we'll sit down with just about any published author.